For help installing on Windows click here, or view 2.0.17 release notes.Xamarin is a free and open source mobile app platform for building native and high-performance iOS, Android, tvOS, watchOS, macOS, and Windows apps in C with. When your download is complete, run the Sync installer and follow the prompts. Supports Windows 7, 8, 10. Upload, sync and share files and folders from your Windows desktop, laptop or tablet. See screenshots, read the latest customer reviews, and compare ratings for WorkingHours Time Tracking / Timesheet.Sync for Windows.All feedback is taken on board and we try to respond to all emails quickly.By not allowing Chrome in the Windows Store, it results in a worse end-user experience - we have to keep the Chrome updater instead of it updating through the Store. The developers of this app are committed to quality and providing a great user experience. The app offers 23 beautiful designs to choose from depending on your taste and preference.That can only improve Windows security.A rendering engine is not worth the negativity it'll bring to the Windows Store."Apps that browse the web must use the appropriate HTML and JavaScript engines provided by the Windows Platform""This is another decision, in the long line of recent MS decisions that are pushing users away, the users who are most easily pushed away are those with somewhere else to go"The first quote (from the article) shows that "The Store" CRapps are *AUTOMATICALLY* *HOBBLED* by being forced into using a potentially *INFERIOR* system of HTML and JavaScript rendering/execution, with NO hope of providing your own tweeks and benefits such that NOBODY can effectively compete with that "Edging" browser. The Windows Store is also their opportunity to reprogram users into getting software from the Store, instead of all the unverifiable websites out there hosting who knows what. Since its launch in 2013, Slack has quickly become the first name in business collaboration and messaging, and its free Mac app is the best way to keep in touch with your team.I've interpreted the results of "decisions from on high" within their corporation, and seen how a small number of "activist types" are driving the ship towards the rocks. And though good people at low levels do their best to try and "fix it", and I most definitely appreciate their efforts, they are up against an INTERNAL BUREAUCRACY that is as OPPRESSIVE as a SOCIALIST DICTATORSHIP.But I've commented on that MANY times before, and I've experienced the effects of it first-hand. What used to work (let's say renew MSDN), but now *MUST* be done through "The Store", has broken, in a bad way. But their overall infrastructure AND bureaucracy, *ESPECIALLY* dealing with "The Store", has shown me that it's a *COMPLETE* *CLUSTER* *BLANK*. I totally get that.And the 2nd quote is a BRILLIANT assessment of where Micro-shaft currently is.I have to wonder if Micro-shaft is *ALSO* *HOBBLING* "The Store" UWP CRapps by (essentially) forcing them into having 2D FLATSO FLUGLY interfaces.Some recent experiences between me Micro-shaft have shown me that the rank/file people are REALLY TRYING to make customers happy and be reasonable. But they wanted a presence in "The Store", so they made an INSTALLER instead.
I pity those who do NOT./me runs FreeBSD most of the time, with Linux and 'some windows' thrown in their, though I _still_ keep my MSDN subscription alive. Those who HAVE an alternative already are moving towards it. STILL, the problems remain, and Micro-shaft CONTINUES to go down the SAME road to HELL as they were when they horked-up "The Metro", Win-10-nic, GWX, UWP, and "The Store".Yes. Most ideologues are also happy to be quite contrary when it comes to things they like/want. Yet to meet a game I can't run on Linux, but you often need a fully patched version on Windows, which often makes the whole exercise redundant.Look, I'm happy to get into "one true Scotsman/OS/text editor" arguments over the appropriate beverage, but in practice purists are down right frustrating. For the applications you want that aren't easily accessible on Linux. Which may be using Google products on it's back end, but you don't really know.I'd love to. For specific instances you don't need it, but then you're searching a specific database like PubMed. I'd love to say to users "oh, you wrote a 400 page document in Word and now it's corrupted? Well, that'll learn ya, use LaTex next time, now off you fuck" but that's not very helpful."I stopped using Google search 2 years ago"And replaced it with what? I'm serious here, I'll use anom methods of searching, but I find that most results are either from Google one way or another, or are just shit. Depending on where you work, that may well mean that you use tools that other people have sourced which you wouldn't touch with a bargepole. They are about as solid in linux or windows, although you can crank a little more out of the cards in linux. But they are market leaders whose products are used by billions, so you you can't declare you're not going to use them and still find work in operations.I <3 linux too, for almost any dedicated system, or for fiddling in the software equivalent of "no user serviceable parts".As an example, I build GPU miners. Sometimes there's only one vendor, also Windows only.I'm not a fan of MS business practices, and while I own Google stock, they are pretty shady too. Most of my clients are from non-tech sectors, and if they are really lucky they will have the choice of two business applications, both of which have the user facing stuff run on Windows. Let me know how many "pure" linux installations are out there in the real world that are not part of a tech/research outfit. If I'm not certified and I bugger up something on a MS system, my indemnity insurance won't cover me, and that will cost me my savings, business and probably my house.So no jobs in corporate then? Fair enough.I could also refuse to work on any MS systems. 2017 Os X App Desktop Clock Stays On Top 2017 Code Base ForThere is no need for a second one with a different logo.They made a choice to wrapper Safari on iOS. Do you want to associate your brand with the capabilities and performance or otherwise of the Edge rendering engine? Whilst it is an OK browser in my view (and certainly the best they have managed to produce to date), there already exists a perfectly acceptable Edge browser for those who want to experience that rendering engine. This isn't a technical constraint, but a commercial one. I'm sure the brains at Google could figure out how to build the same code base for multiple platform targets if that was the only barrier.The real barrier to choice is the requirement to be a wrapper around Edge. But benchmark them in Windows then flash them in Windows and drop them into a linux box and they'll be just fine.Use the right tools for the whilst you are correct to say that the installer won't work on Windows S, I don't think that is really the point. Where do I sign up? I'm guessing they did it to drive Chrome on MacOS. So your page will now render with the safari quirks, not implement a bunch of standards that all the others (including Edge) do, but do so even slower than the one that comes preinstalled. Even though the same rendering engine is used, performance can never equal Safari because of differences in the threading models between the built in Safari browser and what apps can do. As it stands, they are second class citizens. They should have written a blog post on why they cannot produce a real Chrome browser on iOS due to Apple policies, express regret, and express hope that they may one day permit the world's best* browser to be enjoyed by those choosing the iOS platforms for tablet and phones. Office for mac 2016 installerWhat they want is a web browser that syncs between their mobile, their tablet and their computer with a reassuring icon between all device types. The vast majority of people on the street really don't care about rendering engines within web browsers. There is no need for a second one with a different logo."As I said though, people reading The Reg are more likely 'Pro' users at least. Do you want to associate your brand with the capabilities and performance or otherwise of the Edge rendering engine? Whilst it is an OK browser in my view (and certainly the best they have managed to produce to date), there already exists a perfectly acceptable Edge browser for those who want to experience that rendering engine. This isn't a technical constraint, but a commercial one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKim ArchivesCategories |